Nano Flow Irrigation hero banner
2026 Pilots are running. Plan yours! Start Planning
Drop Comparison - Nano Irrigation

Compare accepted industry standard drip irrigation on the left against the new ultra-low-flow standard on the right.

Left: Conventional
Accepted Industry Standard
Emitter flow (GPH / LPH) --
Conventional
Drops/sec
--
Drops/hr
--
Nano Flow
Drops/sec
--
Drops/hr
--
Right: Nano Flow Irrigation
New Ultra-Low-Flow Rate Standard
Emitter flow (GPH / LPH) --
Pilot Planning 2026

Continuous ultra-low-flow irrigation

Heavy-wall half-inch drip line designed to run continuously at roughly 1% of conventional flow.

~1% flow rate reduces demand for Water Energy Infrastructure
Gravity validation 0.0025 - 0.06 GPH emitters supporting operating pressures ranging from 1-30 PSI. Surface or Sub-Surface.
  • Surface or subsurface layouts
  • Flow and pressure matched during 1-on-1 review
  • Buffer reservoir options available where delivery timing is constrained
Pressure 1 to 30 PSI

Low operating pressure range with substantially lower friction loss at reduced flow velocity.

Flow 0.0025 to 0.06 GPH

Ultra-low discharge range for continuous surface or subsurface irrigation layouts.

Configuration High, medium, or low pressure setups

Configured around field conditions, delivery method, and reservoir strategy.

Technical planning support only Start public planning here. This tool provides preliminary hydraulic, agronomic, and infrastructure decision support for scenario comparison. Outputs are not stamped engineering plans and should not be used for final design, permitting, construction, or regulatory submission without qualified professional review.
Step 1 of 5
Start

Build your own Nano Flow system

Press Start

< 5 minutes

Need a preview first? Use the persistent Guided walkthrough button in the header. Nothing in the preview is saved.

Display units
Document: Preliminary planning output
Intended use: Scenario comparison and professional review


Not intended for: Stamped design, permit use, or construction

This tool estimates hydraulic behavior and planning assumptions. Final site-specific design, approvals, and implementation documents remain the responsibility of qualified professionals where required.

Step 2 · Layout & Distribution

Choose what governs irrigation discharge pressure in this design.

Select whether line pressure comes from the source, the reservoir head, or a booster pump fed by the reservoir.
Pressure behavior

Set whether controlled discharge pressure is stable or a time-series signal.

Stable uses a single PSI value. Variable generates a pressure curve over time.
Layout Inputs

Use sliders or type exact values below.

Emitter Spacing
in
Row Length
ft
Number of Rows
Row Spacing
ft
Key Stats

Live layout and hydraulic snapshot from the current spacing, pressure mode, and selected dropper.

— emitters
— area
Row: — ft · Emitter: — in
Dropper —
Initial pressure —
Average emitter flow —
Storage Size(Dimensions)
Reservoir geometry and refill cadence are active when storage authority belongs to the reservoir.
Reservoir Templates
Choose by application: IBC totes, vertical tanks, backyard pool-size tanks, or liners.


How long the reservoir must run without refill.



For square, width = length. For circle, leave width empty.

If circle: diameter here. If square: leave blank or same as width.

Enter the starting water height for the reservoir.

Adds head pressure: psi gain = ft × 0.433. Default 0 for ground level.

Enter time horizon, pick shape, and dimensions.
Dropper flow curve preview
D100 - D200 - D300 - D400

Pick one class-specific flow vs. pressure curve (100 / 200 / 300 / 400).

Flow (GPH) vs Pressure (psi) Pressure (psi) Flow (GPH)
Dropper 100 Dropper 200 Dropper 300 Dropper 400

Step 3 · Flow & Pressure Design

Review usable head, cutoff time, flow decay, and usable volume as the time slider moves.

⚠ Shortfall
Key stats
— emitters
— area
Row: — ft
Emitter: — in

Dropper —
Initial pressure —
Average emitter flow —
Hydraulic System Behavior
Reservoir discharge simulation based on NanoFlow demand and selected geometry.
Usable volume
Initial height
Initial pressure
Elevation boost
Total area irrigated
Average emitter flow
Refill quick ref
Details
Time until min pressure
Flow at start
Flow at end
Min pressure threshold
Surplus/deficit vs interval
Auto-balanced footprint
Dead volume (below minimum usable pressure)
Emitter Flow Tach Avg —
Current t
Emitter flow
Avg emitter flow
Delivered volume
Current t
Height
Pressure
Pressure from height
Pressure from elevation
Emitter flow
Total flow
Remaining usable vol
Remaining time to min pressure
Visualize usable head, cutoff time, flow decay, and usable volume.
Height
Pressure
Total flow
Remaining usable
Instantaneous emitter flow

Only water above the minimum usable head contributes to irrigation.

Pressure + flow over time
Pressure Total flow Hydraulic cutoff
Cumulative usable volume
Usable volume delivered

Application Rate vs Allowable Infiltration Rate

Typical allowable infiltration rate ranges for sandy, loam, and clay soils compared against the modeled Nano Flow application rate to confirm the design stays below the soil-type limit.

Water Application Summary

Total Volume Delivered
Application Rate System average discharge
Delivery Method Continuous distribution No peak-demand irrigation event
Water Control Basis Flow x time Not schedule-based

Water is applied continuously at a controlled rate, rather than in discrete irrigation events.

Modeled scenario assumes constant demand. Field runtime may extend based on crop stage and reduced demand over time.

Flow curves synced to inspect playhead
D100 - D200 - D300 - D400
Flow (GPH) vs Pressure (psi) Pressure (psi) Flow (GPH)
Dropper 100 Dropper 200 Dropper 300 Dropper 400

Step 4 · Infrastructure & Cost Analysis

Compare the accepted industry-standard system against Nano Flow irrigation as a system consequence comparison, not just a product comparison.

Accepted Industry Standard

17
At 40.0 max set flow available.

Nano Flow Irrigation

1
At 40.0 max set flow available.
Set reduction: 94.1%
Hydraulic architecture: Gravity Reservoir

Reservoir head governs pressure and runtime.

Set reduction derived from max flow per set and on-demand flow. Review engineering cost analysis data.

Capacity snapshot
Uses your entered max flow per set and calculated demand.
Max flow per set 40.0 max set flow
Total flow · Accepted Standard 666.67 gpm
Total flow · Nano Flow 6.667 gpm
Item Accepted Standard Nano Flow
Pump $62,000 (Over 300 HP) $1,800 (Below 10 HP)
Filter $3,400 (4" disc filter) $120 (3/4" spin-down filter)
Mainline pipe $9,200 (4" PVC) $520 (1" poly)
Dripline cost $16,800 (benchmark conventional) Finish with Cost Analysis Request.
Valves/Sets $20,400 (~17 sets) $960 (~1 sets)
Controls $2,500 $2,500
Total Infrastructure Cost $114,300 Cost review required
Infrastructure Cost Review Request

Enter valid contact details to request infrastructure cost analysis. Let's follow up with next-step recommendations for your application.

Hydraulic Snapshot

Key Stats

Dropper
Acres irrigated
Average emitter flow
Average system flow
Delivered volume

Discharge Pressure Behavior

Average line pressure
Pressure range
Pressure authority

Hydraulic System Summary

Design mode
Storage authority
Refill interval
Operating pressure

Step 5 · System Review Summary

Hydraulic Snapshot

Key Stats

Dropper
Acres irrigated
Average emitter flow
Average system flow
Delivered volume

Discharge Pressure Behavior

Average line pressure
Pressure range
Pressure authority

Hydraulic System Summary

Design mode
Storage authority
Refill interval
Operating pressure

Hydraulic Interpretation

Hydraulic condition pending Comparison condition pending

Hydraulic interpretation will appear here.

This summary reflects hydraulic behavior only.

Design Snapshot

Dropper
Average line pressure
Pressure range
Average emitter flow
Average system flow
Delivered volume over interval
Refill interval
Pressure authority
Storage authority
Design mode

Conventional Equivalent Scenario

Dropper average emitter flow
Conventional equivalent emitter flow
Peak flow requirement

Derived conventional flow assumptions updated.

Consequences

Max flow per set used
Accepted standard sets
Nano Flow sets
Hydraulic architecture
Pump sizing class
Filter sizing class
Mainline sizing class
Cost analysis status
Conventional vs Nano Flow

Root-Zone Moisture Stability

See how continuous ultra-low-flow delivery can reduce excess application by maintaining moisture inside a narrower working band.

Water savings are illustrated as avoided over-application, not reduced plant access to water.

Conceptual Pivot

The question is not how fast water can be applied. The question is how much excess water must be applied to keep the root zone functional.

Root-Zone Moisture Stability and Applied Water Efficiency

Relative soil water status vs Time

Panel A: Conventional event irrigation Over-applied / drainage-prone Target moisture band Too dry Drainage loss Dry-back swing Surface overshoot Time Relative soil water status Panel B: Nano Flow continuous delivery Over-applied / drainage-prone Target moisture band Too dry Stable working band Less overshoot Time Relative soil water status
Conventional event irrigation
  • High-flow pulses overshoot the target moisture band.
  • More gross water is applied to maintain coverage through dry-back.
Nano Flow continuous delivery
  • Steady low input holds moisture closer to the target band.
  • Less overshoot reduces excess applied water.
Structured Summary

Copy this text to save or share your scenario.

Step 6 · Save, Share & Snapshot

Save the summary, generate a shareable record, and keep this scenario for follow-up.

Preliminary Planning Output

NanoFlow Preliminary Planning Summary

Generated —
Project ID-
Share link-
Snapshot ID-
Intended useScenario evaluation and professional review
Not intended forPermit submission, construction, or stamped design
Review requiredQualified engineer, irrigation designer, or TSP

Project Overview

Location
Crop
Area
System Type
Water Source
Soil Class
Delivery Constraints

System Design

Line Type
Emitter Spacing
Operating Pressure
Daily Application Rate
Storage / Buffer Size
Reservoir footprint vs irrigated area

Performance Targets

Comparison Window
Irrigation Days / Year
Water Target
Season Length
Root Depth
MAD
Target ET Coverage
Expected Uniformity
Peak Demand Reduction
Stress Mitigation Strategy

Cost & Return

Estimated Infrastructure Cost
Annual OPEX Savings
Energy Reduction
Water Savings
NanoFlow usable water
Conventional water (20 min/day)
Projected Payback

Validation & Next Steps

Pilot Status
Demo Option
Monitoring Plan
Third-Party Validation
Recommended Timeline
Required Approvals

Notes & Assumptions

Notes are saved with the summary snapshot.
Export / Share Options
Schedule Review
Summary ready.
Launch Recap Held Feb 20, 2026 · 4:00 PM Mountain Time
Launch Recap

Pilot Evaluation and Validation Framework

Recap from Feb 20, 2026 on how ultra-low-flow continuous irrigation is modeled, screened, and validated under real delivery constraints. Review the summary to revisit the gravity pressure data, discharge curves, and the pilot playbook for 2026 deployments.

Launch complete
Held Feb 20, 2026 · 4:00 PM MT
Pressure window
1 to 30 PSI
Gravity-capable validation range
Emitter flow
0.0025 to 0.06 GPH
Ultra-low-flow operating band reviewed in the recap
Deployment fit
Surface or subsurface
Matched to soil response and delivery constraints
Screening process
1-on-1 technical review
Pressure, flow, and reservoir assumptions checked before pilot launch

Use the recap as a technical brief before planning a pilot, grant narrative, or internal infrastructure review.

New Ultra-Low Flow Standard

Just turn it on and leave it running.

Nano Flow delivers roughly 1% of conventional drip demand, extending run time while holding the root zone in a steadier, oxygenated moisture band. The result is a lower-demand irrigation profile that is easier to model, easier to supply, and easier to explain to technical reviewers.

Flow Profile ~1% of conventional drip demand
Recommended Operating Pressure 1 to 30 PSI low-head to standard supply options
Emitter Flow 0.0025 to 0.06 GPH continuous surface or subsurface delivery
  • Keep roots hydrated without runoff or percolation losses.
  • Lower pump, zone, and pressure requirements.
  • Less pressure loss means better uniformity!
  • Better moisture for stronger yields.
Build Your Own System ~15 minutes to see the difference.
Play the Nano Flow irrigation comparison animation
Nano Flow (24 hours) vs. Traditional (15 minutes)

Watch The Dropper Series by Nano Flow Irrigation to see why ultra-low-flow rates outperform the established industry standard.
Demand Simulator

Match Discharge To Plant Uptake

Adjust emitter discharge and row geometry to compare conventional on-demand flow with Nano Flow Irrigation's continuous trickle.

On-Demand Impact(Infrastructure, Energy, Water)

A: Nano Flow

GPH
--
LPH
--
Drops per hour
--

B: Conventional

GPH
--
LPH
--
Drops per hour
--
Emitter Spacing (inches) 18 "
Row Length (feet) 1000 '
Number of Rows 2
Row Spacing 5 feet
Scenario A

Nano Flow
Irrigation

Scenario B


Accepted Industry Standard

Flow Converter

GPH
Gallons per hour --
Liters per hour --
CC per hour --
Drops per hour --

Drops Flow Converter

Measured interval
drops every seconds

Per Second --
Per Minute --
Per Hour --
Equivalent Flow 0.0000 GPH

If you can turn it on and leave it running… why waste water?

  • Supplement plants for longer periods
  • Reduce on-demand water and energy
  • Ease soil tension and compaction
  • Lower flow velocity, friction losses, and infrastructure needs
  • Save water while boosting production

Less pressure loss means better uniformity.

Did you know?

There are roughly 20 drops in 0.001 liters of water.

Animation of Nano Flow's fast valve loop

The Dropper Series

Each emitter in The Dropper Series reaches ultra-low flow rates unmatched by conventional drip manufacturers.

The system is designed to run for days or weeks at a time. Set it and forget it. Operating at just 1% of traditional flow, the line delivers a constant, gentle stream that cuts total water use while maintaining plant health.

This steady trickle lets growers run more irrigation sets simultaneously without the risk of runoff or overwatering.

Israel Ruttenberg headshot

Israel Ruttenberg

CEO & Founder

I grew up around innovators who built low-flow solutions from the ground up. Inspired by my grandfather’s engineering curiosity, I challenge the status quo so growers can do more with less water.

Book a live chat

Drops vs Gravity

Liquid that flows from a single dripper to the ground continues to move within the soil due to two forces: gravitational force, which pulls the droplet downward, and capillary force, which draws the droplet in all directions (Gardner, 1979; Schwartzman et al., 1984).

Large amounts of water over a short duration lead to deeper percolation because gravitational forces dominate. At extremely ultra-low flows the capillary forces take over and the gravitational forces become negligible, making deep percolation far less likely (Kenig et al., 1995; Raviv et al., 2008).

Read more

Micro vs Nano Irrigation

What would you do with a flow rate of 0.01 gallons per hour? Lead stewardship with Nano Flow Irrigation. Our drippers achieve flow rates that conventional manufacturers have yet to match, eliminating the need for excessive infrastructure to manage allowable depletion or drought deficit strategies.

Just keep the system running—turn it on and forget about it. No excessive runoff, percolation, or drainage issues from pests, diseases, water logging, or contamination. As long as feeder roots stay moist and aerated, plants thrive; avoid stress surges and you avoid lost production. Just keep the flow low.

Read more

Nano Flow Irrigation — Frequently Asked Questions

What problem does Nano Flow Irrigation solve?Root stress • Runoff • Waste
Traditional drip often applies water faster than plants can use it, which drives ponding, percolation losses, and oxygen deprivation in the root zone. Nano Flow Irrigation's drippers operates at about 1 percent of standard flow rates to match plant uptake and stabilize soil moisture.
How do ultra-low flow rates improve drought deficit irrigation and ET balance?
Ultra-low flow maintains a steady, shallow wetting front that tracks evapotranspiration. Instead of large on-off cycles, the profile stays near field capacity with better root aeration and less evaporative loss at the surface.
What is the water-saving potential compared to standard drip or micro?
Systems designed with Nano Flow Irrigation's drippers can reduce discharge per emitter by up to 99 percent while maintaining crop performance, because delivery is paced to plant consumption rather than system convenience.
How do ultra-low flow rates promote uniformity and root health?
At very low discharge, capillary forces dominate over gravity which spreads moisture more evenly around each emitter. The root zone remains moist and oxygenated which supports finer roots and higher nutrient uptake efficiency.
Why do lower application rates reduce root stress and boost yield potential?
Consistent moisture avoids the drought-then-saturation swing that creates plant stress. Stable oxygen and water availability supports flowering and fruit set which can lead to more frequent or stronger yield events.
Can ultra-low flow improve nutrient use efficiency?
Yes. Continuous low-rate delivery maintains solution mobility near roots without flushing nutrients out of the profile which can improve fertilizer efficiency and overall vigor.
How does Nano Flow Irrigation mitigate friction losses and pressure requirements?
Lower velocities reduce frictional head loss which lowers required operating pressure. Fields can run on low-head reservoirs or gravity where practical which cuts energy use and simplifies infrastructure.
Is the Nano Flow system complicated to operate?
No. The simplicity is the point. Steady low-rate delivery reduces the need for complex control logic. Scheduling becomes more predictable which makes both sensor-driven and manual decisions easier.
Can I integrate Nano Flow Irrigation with existing manifolds and controls?
In many cases yes. Tubing and laterals can connect to existing valves and manifolds with modest adjustments. Many growers retrofit a test block first then scale after validating results.
How much water can I actually save at the field level?
Savings depend on crop, soil, spacing, and climate. As a planning reference, emitter discharge can drop to as low as 0.0025 gallons per hour with uniformity maintained which materially reduces daily water demand per acre.
Use this planning reference to discuss final set times and volumes with qualified irrigation professionals.
What is the financial impact?
Lower flow and pressure reduce pump size, pipe diameters, and energy consumption. Simpler infrastructure means fewer failure points and lower maintenance. These combine to improve payback and total cost of ownership.
Why choose Nano Flow over conventional drip/micro?
It installs like heavy-wall half-inch drip but operates at about 1 percent of the flow rate. That shift turns irrigation into a low-pressure, low-energy, high-control process that supports resilience in water-limited regions.
How does this support long-term water sustainability?
Reducing discharge per emitter at scale preserves regional supplies, improves on-farm reliability, and aligns with conservation programs that reward durable efficiency rather than short-term restrictions.
How does Nano Flow's Dropper Series avoid clogging?

The Dropper Series does not rely on a single micro-orifice to control discharge. Flow is regulated across a distributed pathway, so there is no single choke point where particles are forced to lodge. This makes the emitter less sensitive to particulates than would normally be expected at ultra low flow, while still requiring standard filtration practices.

The system is also designed for continuous operation. This reduces the surge, settle, surge behavior common in canal and scheduled delivery systems, where debris is mobilized during start up and allowed to settle during shutdown.

Clogging in drip systems is typically driven by two conditions: forcing water through very small restriction points and repeated start and stop cycling that creates pressure and velocity spikes.

By minimizing cycling, the emitter avoids repeated mechanical loading seen in pressure compensating diaphragm designs, reducing fatigue over time.

The result is a more stable operating condition that lowers clogging risk and supports longer functional emitter life.